« | Home | »

Politico: Obama, McCain Funds ‘Equal’

From those shameless re-writers of history at the Politico:

Obama, McCain funds equally matched

By JEANNE CUMMINGS | 12/5/08

Barack Obama’s financial advantage over Republican rival John McCain shrunk significantly in the final days of the campaign, new financial disclosure records show.

According to the reports released by the Federal Election Commission Friday, the president-elect raised nearly $111 million between Oct. 16 and Nov. 24.

While that sum is staggering, the Republican National Committee raised $81 million during the same period. And McCain, who could not collect private donations because he accepted taxpayer money to finance his general election, entered the final sprint with about $25 million in the cash.

That suggests a far more equally matched showdown that many observers expected.

The figures also demonstrate how successfully McCain was able to stretch his $85 million general election allotment into a much richer campaign kitty that could stay competitive with Obama’s fundraising apparatus.

Between Oct. 16 and the end of November, Obama reported spending $136 million, of which $62 million was on media buys alone.

McCain and the RNC spent about $105 million on the presidential campaign during the same period, the bulk of which were media buys made by the RNC in conjunction with or on behalf of the McCain-Palin ticket.

Obama managed to maintain an important, if not dramatic, advantage largely because of cash accumulated throughout the 2008 campaign season and his ability to sustain a red hot fundraising pace.

He began the final sprint with $66 million already in the bank and recorded only two days during the period covered by the report on which he failed to raise a million dollars or more.

In the eight days leading to Election Day, Obama saw $20 million in donations pour into his coffers. He ended the race with $30 million still in the bank.

Overall, Obama first post-election report shows that the once little-known Illinois senator raised a total of $770 million for the campaign, the records show.

Of that, nearly $750 million came from nearly 4 million donors, according to the campaign.

What a preposterous headline. What a preposterous article.

Does the Politico really believe that $81 million "matches" $111 million? If so, then they can give us the $30 million dollar (38%) difference.

Oh, and never mind this article from Bloomberg:

Obama Spent Four Times as Much as McCain at Race End

By Jonathan D. Salant and Kristin Jensen

Dec. 5 (Bloomberg) — Barack Obama’s record-breaking fundraising gave him four times as much cash to spend as rival John McCain in the final months of the presidential campaign.

Obama brought in $291 million between Sept. 1 and Nov. 24 and spent $349 million, helped by funds left over from a primary battle that began in February 2007, his campaign said. McCain, a Republican senator from Arizona, spent $78.9 million of the $84.1 million he received in public financing.

The president-elect shattered fundraising records, with donations of $746 million for the primary and general campaigns. Obama previously reported raising $642 million through Oct. 15. The campaigns reported their final totals yesterday to the Federal Election Commission…

But forget such facts, the intent of this absurd revisionism from Politico is like that of any number of similar articles that have since come out.

As the Politico declares:

That suggests a far more equally matched showdown that many observers expected.

Forget all of those stories about what a wonderful fundraiser Mr. Obama was. How that showed how popular he was. This is the new media mantra.

Never mind that Mr. Obama broke his word and refused public financing and spent more than three quarters of a billion dollars on his election. (The latest number is $777 million.)

Never mind that Barack Obama raised and spent twice the amount that John McCain did. 

Never mind that there has never been such a wide disparity between the spending of the two major parties’ Presidential candidates in our country’s history.

None of that means Mr. Obama "bought" the election. Put that right out of your thoughts.

Only Republicans buy elections.

10 Responses to “Politico: Obama, McCain Funds ‘Equal’”

  1. Weasel

    Hey Politico, which value is greater, 111 million or 81 million?
    That reminds me of the “Talking Barbie” who used to say, “Math class is hard”…

  2. I think conservatives need to buy up all these bankrupt newspapers, fire the liberals and hire all of us who have been loyally searching for truth on websites like this one. I’m serious.

  3. latinchic

    Ohhhh……….I likey the newspaper idea.

    I want a spanish section, please.

  4. @latinchic, How would we go about it? Are you good at writing business plans? I stink at that stuff, I’m just good at writing obscene short stories, sarcastic editorials, lit-crit, and arrogant marginalia on my student papers. Maybe if we can find someone to write a business plan we can go door to door in rich Republican neighborhoods and solicit funds to buy the Rocky Mountain News or — Hell, why not? — the Washington Post. We’ll have a Spanish section and hire lots of pro-life Christian conservatives, then make all the libby columnists and Maureen Dowdists clean toilets until they quit.

  5. nascarnation

    Where did all that money for O’Bammy come from?
    We’ll find out as his administration governs.

  6. catie

    I am the first to admit that I am not a whiz kid at Math but even I know that 81 million is not the same as 111 million. Evidently there are a plethora of stupid people at the Politico.
    @Latinos & Latinchic-good luck finding the country club Republicans willing to help you out. You need to talk to the regular Republican folks. BTW I would love to see Maureen Dowd having to clean a toliet.

  7. Correct nascarnation. That is exactly how we will know.

    Remember that China closed a 30 year technology gap in weapons technology to less than 10 in the two terms that Clinton was president.

  8. @catie & latinchic: Check this out: http://www.heraldtribune.com/a.....p_for_sale

    The Miami Herald is up for sale. How cool would it be if a conservative could buy it up and act out our fantasies of a true right-wing press?

  9. latinchic

    The fearless Michelle Malkin has caught onto the idea!

    http://michellemalkin.com/2008.....newspaper/

    Latinos, no idea about that man. Sorry. I can only offer up the hispanic/Christian/common sense perspective.

    Then again, common sense isn’t common anymore. Maybe there’s a vacancy for me somewhere…

  10. Latinchic, look people are already copping our ideas. That means we have a future in mass communications — we are in tune with the zeitgeist! :)

    @Catie: Maybe our dream will come true, a conservative will buy the Times, and Ms. Dowd will be on her hands and knees scrubbing the toilet soon.

« Home | To Top
« | »